Bruce v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Prior act evidence to corroborate the testimony of the victim in the face of a claim of fabrication is a relevancy issue.\
• “the similar fact evidence was relevant to corroborate the victim’s testimony and rebut [a] claim of fabrication. Admitting similar fact evidence for this purpose has been addressed by a number of courts ... ”
• “The victim’s and [witness’s] testimony demonstrated a clear pattern of conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Elmer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-12· cited 9×
• State v. Tameris
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-02-18· cited 2×
• JOSE REYNA v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-08-26
• ANDREW JAMES LYDECKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-04-05

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-25· cited 1,148×
• Robertson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-10· cited 241×
• Heuring v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-09-24· cited 147×
• McLean v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-07-06· cited 125×
• Shapiro v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-23· cited 24×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-28· cited 17×
• Kulling v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-06· cited 13×
• Foburg v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-03· cited 11×
• State v. Richman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-10· cited 9×