Nevada Supreme Court· 7/22/1996
Doyle v. State
Citations
- 921 P.2d 901
- 112 Nev. 879
- 1996 Nev. LEXIS 124
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that evidence establishing that the penetration occurred at or around the time of death will not support a conviction for sexual assault
- holding that evidence establishing that tire penetration occurred at or around the time of death will not support a conviction for sexual assault
- holding that once steps two and three occur in a Batson analysis, the issue of whether a prima facie case exists is moot
- stating that the plain meaning of NRS 201.450 “is to punish the act of sexual penetration of a dead human body, regardless of motive”
- reaffirming the holding of Powell v. State, 108 Nev. 700, 838 P.2d 921 (1992)
- describing the independent proof necessary to satisfy the corpus delicti rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Springer, Steffen, Young, Shearing, Rose
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Byford v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2000-02-28· cited 246×
- Nika v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2008-12-31· cited 149×
- Kaczmarek v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2004-06-07· cited 112×
- Leonard v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1998-12-09· cited 80×
- Gaxiola v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2005-09-22· cited 80×
- Tinch v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-10-01· cited 70×
- State v. HonieUtah Supreme Court· 2002-01-11· cited 54×
- Thomas v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 53×
- Brass v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2012-12-27· cited 40×
- Bolden v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2005-12-15· cited 39×
- People v. GutierrezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-06-30· cited 36×
- Cordova v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2000-08-21· cited 34×
- Doyle v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2000-02-03· cited 33×
- Lobato v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2004-09-03· cited 33×
- Grant v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2001-06-13· cited 30×
- Schoels v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1998-10-27· cited 26×
- Furbay v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 25×
- Tanksley v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-08-28· cited 22×
- Atkins v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-08-28· cited 22×
- Williams v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-08-28· cited 18×
Cites
55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court· 1977-01-11· cited 4,496×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court· 1976-06-07· cited 3,450×
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court· 1995-05-15· cited 3,008×
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 2,053×
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-12-06· cited 1,280×
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-04-24· cited 1,166×
- Yates v. EvattSupreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 932×
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-12-06· cited 719×
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-01-16· cited 653×
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 518×
- People v. AlcalaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-08-23· cited 278×
- People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1958-04-29· cited 261×
- State v. GallegosArizona Supreme Court· 1994-03-15· cited 158×
- Robert G. Lamb v. Marvin Jernigan, WardenEleventh Circuit· 1982-08-23· cited 125×
- State v. ArredondoArizona Supreme Court· 1987-12-03· cited 115×
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-03-08· cited 105×
- McCarty v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-03-17· cited 102×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.