Skip to main content

Sutton v. State

Citations

  • 776 A.2d 47
  • 139 Md. App. 412
  • 2001 Md. App. LEXIS 120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a voluntary intoxication instruction was not warranted when “no evidence was established at trial of any impairment of [appellant’s] ability to form the specific intent to commit robbery at the time of the murder”
  • “Where evidence is excluded, a proffer of substance and relevance must be made in order to preserve the issue for appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Submitted Before Salmon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.