Court of Appeals of Maryland· 11/12/1991

White v. State

Citations

598 A.2d 187
324 Md. 626
1991 Md. LEXIS 198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “[a] trial court’s determination on relevance will not be reversed by an appellate court absent a clear showing that it abused its discretion.”
determinations on relevance will not be reversed absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion
In the context of determining whether witness has potential bias “[t]he trial court has a great deal of discretion in deciding whether particular evidence indicates partiality.”
In the context of determining whether witness has potential bias \[t]he trial court has a great deal of discretion in deciding whether particular evidence indicates partiality.\
Argument not made at trial in support of admission of evidence cannot be asserted for the first time on appeal
argument not made to the trial court is not properly before the appellate court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chasanow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.