Skip to main content

Breakfield v. State

Citations

  • 195 Md. App. 377
  • 6 A.3d 381
  • 2010 Md. App. LEXIS 149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court did not abuse its discretion when it prevented three defense witnesses from testifying as a sanction for failing to disclose the witnesses until trial
  • holding that the court did not abuse its discretion when it prevented three defense witnesses from testifying as a sanction for failing to disclose the witnesses until trial
  • opining that the limited question before this Court is not “whether the evidence should have or probably would have persuaded the majority of fact finders but only whether it possibly could have persuaded any rational fact finder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matricciani

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.