Supreme Court of Georgia· 3/15/2021
Pender v. State
Citations
- 856 S.E.2d 302
- 311 Ga. 98
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that jury could infer that defendant rubbed child victim’s genital area to arouse his own sexual desires, where, among other things, there was evidence that the defendant took nude photographs of the victim
- following trial, the jury found the appellant guilty on seven counts of the indictment, but was unable to reach a verdict on two of the counts, which were placed on the dead docket; a direct appeal followed
- applying plain error standard to the appellant’s unpreserved Confrontation Clause claim
- “A lack of intent to restore the property to its rightful owner can be demonstrated by direct evidence or inferred from the circumstances.”
- no plain error because even assuming a firearms examiner’s statement was “tes- timonial,” any error in admitting it had no effect on the outcome of trial
- evidence was sufficient to support theft by receiving stolen property conviction where the State 56 presented evidence that the defendant was in possession of the truck that had been stolen by his accomplice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Seals v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2021-06-18· cited 62×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2022-09-20· cited 28×
- HENDERSON v. THE STATE (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia· 2023-08-21· cited 24×
- Park v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2022-10-04· cited 18×
- Talley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2022-06-30· cited 15×
- Warren v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2022-09-20· cited 12×
- Greene v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2023-06-21· cited 6×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2024-03-19· cited 4×
- Shian Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-06-30
- Daniel Ramirez-Ortiz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-11-08
- Dejonquavius Shine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2022-01-14
- Alexander Braden Compton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2024-01-08
- GARRETT SMITH v. STATE OF GEORGIACourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2025-02-28
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2025-06-24
- Quintanar v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2025-06-24
- Ronald Brantley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2024-02-29
- Ragland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2026-04-21
- Dennis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2026-05-19
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
- Gray v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1998-03-09· cited 723×
- Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1981-03-09· cited 552×
- State v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia· 2020-02-10· cited 247×
- Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2016-01-19· cited 167×
- Davenport v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2020-07-02· cited 159×
- Lupoe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2016-11-21· cited 125×
- United States v. BarnerEleventh Circuit· 2009-06-29· cited 113×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-09-09· cited 108×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2017-10-30· cited 93×
- DAVIS v. THE STATE (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-06-10· cited 67×
- Collum v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-03-19· cited 58×
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1992-02-13· cited 57×
- Burney v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2016-10-17· cited 54×
- Kemp v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2018-02-19· cited 52×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.