Supreme Court of Florida· 6/22/1995
Hayes v. State
Citations
- 660 So. 2d 257
- 1995 WL 368405
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it was impermissible for the prosecution to elicit testimony that the defense in particular did not request DNA testing, and then rely on that information in its closing argument
- holding that prosecutor's questioning and comments regarding defense's failure to forensically test various pieces of scientific evidence were improper and that narrow exception did not apply because defendant did not present an affirmative defense
- emphasizing the application of the Frye test to the testing procedures used in the analysis
- allowing prosecutor to ask if defense had requested testing of blood stains and prosecutor’s argument regarding the adverse inference to be drawn from appellant’s failure to test hair samples resulted in reversible error
- Florida follows the Frye test to determine the admissibility of new or novel scientific evidence
- Florida follows the Frye test to determine the admissibility of new or novel scientific evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Overton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. ClarkColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-08-17· cited 698×
- State v. RochaNebraska Supreme Court· 2017-02-03· cited 500×
- Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-03· cited 222×
- Chandler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-10-16· cited 128×
- Brim v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-01-16· cited 113×
- Hadden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-02-06· cited 113×
- Henyard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-12-19· cited 101×
- Murray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-17· cited 86×
- Murray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-30· cited 65×
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-04-03· cited 57×
- Overton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-11-29· cited 55×
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2011-02-10· cited 49×
- State v. QuatrevingtSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1996-02-28· cited 47×
- State v. MeadorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-15· cited 43×
- Gosciminski v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-09-12· cited 43×
- People v. LehmkuhlColorado Court of Appeals· 2004-12-30· cited 40×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-18· cited 39×
- United States v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2004-05-04· cited 36×
- Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-10-05· cited 33×
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-12-20· cited 33×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-25· cited 1,148×
- Vivona v. ConboySupreme Court· 1959-10-12· cited 351×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-18· cited 152×
- Drake v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-05-21· cited 107×
- Andrews v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-10-20· cited 97×
- Flanagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-09-09· cited 95×
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-01-05· cited 72×
- Stokes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-06· cited 69×
- Peek v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-04-17· cited 66×
- Buckrem v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-01-26· cited 38×
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-09-18· cited 21×
- Vargas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-01· cited 18×
- Brim v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-12· cited 10×
- People v. KeeneNew York Supreme Court· 1992-10-29· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.