State v. MacK

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting expert testimony based on hypnosis, noting that for hypnosis to be “therapeutically useful, it need not produce historically accurate memory”
• hypnosis safeguards, recommended by Dr. Martin T. Orne, a leading expert in hypnosis, to ensure freedom from suggestion, noted but not adopted by this court
• although hypnotically adduced recall not strictly analogous to mechanical testing, Frye equally applicable
• although hypnotically adduced recall not strictly analogous to mechanical testing, Frye equally applicable
• noting, without adopting, safeguards recommended by Dr. Orne.
• \[T]he results [must be] scientifically reliable as accurate.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

140 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• People v. Brown
  California Supreme Court· 1985-12-05· cited 411×
• People v. Shirley
  California Supreme Court· 1982-03-11· cited 314×
• State v. Hurd
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-07-14· cited 277×
• State v. Saldana
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-31· cited 204×
• People Ex Rel. M.M., Jr.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-04-16· cited 182×
• State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-05-04· cited 181×
• Hernandez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-06-04· cited 179×
• People v. Guerra
  California Supreme Court· 1984-11-21· cited 173×
• People v. Hughes
  New York Court of Appeals· 1983-07-05· cited 170×
• Leatrice Little v. Bill Armontrout
  Eighth Circuit· 1987-12-23· cited 149×
• People v. Wilson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1987-04-02· cited 149×
• State v. Schwartz
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-11-03· cited 141×
• Bundy v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-05-09· cited 135×
• State v. Ture
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-06-29· cited 127×
• Bundy v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-06-21· cited 113×
• Commonwealth v. Kater
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-03-23· cited 100×
• Vivian Sprynczynatyk and Paul Sprynczynatyk, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee
  Eighth Circuit· 1985-09-17· cited 97×
• Chapman v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1982-01-14· cited 96×
• State v. Martin
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-06-07· cited 96×
• State v. Iwakiri
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1984-05-07· cited 90×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Frye v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
• United States v. Narciso
  E.D. Michigan· 1977-12-19· cited 167×
• Harding v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-10-09· cited 113×
• United States v. Lamar Adams, United States of America v. James Lee Pinkerton
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-08-28· cited 105×
• Greenfield v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1974-04-22· cited 83×
• State v. Kolander
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1952-03-21· cited 75×
• People v. Ebanks
  California Supreme Court· 1897-08-23· cited 55×
• State v. Pusch
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1950-12-30· cited 54×
• State Ex Rel. Trimble v. Hedman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-11-26· cited 49×
• State v. Goblirsch
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-07-23· cited 38×
• State v. Hill
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-04-08· cited 35×
• State v. Wakefield
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-02-03· cited 16×
• People v. Harper
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1969-07-30· cited 16×