Skip to main content
· 9/18/1992

Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Stein

Citations

  • 612 A.2d 880
  • 328 Md. 1
  • 1992 Md. LEXIS 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • equating the ‘“need to inspect’ with relevance and the existence of ‘a reasonable possibility that review of the records would result in discovery of usable evidence’ in determining the discoverability of confidential records.”
  • a defendant is not entitled to in camera review of a murder victim’s psychiatric records absent a showing of how the file could likely be related to the defense
  • a defendant is not entitled to in camera review of a murder victim's psychiatric records absent a showing of how the file could likely be related to the defense
  • “[T]he order from which it has appealed is a discovery order, which normally is interlocutory and, consequently, nonappealable”
  • “[T]he order from which it has appealed is a discovery order, which normally is interlocutory and, consequently, unappealable.”
  • discussing elements of collateral order doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Rodowsky, McAuliffe, Chasanow, Karwacki, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.