Supreme Court of South Carolina· 5/23/1988
Stevenson v. Stevenson
Citations
- 368 S.E.2d 901
- 295 S.C. 412
- 1988 S.C. LEXIS 69
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding an award of attorney fees will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion
- stating that the trial courts award of attorneys fees will not be overturned unless it is controlled by an error of law or is without evidentiary support
- holding the decision whether to award attorney fees is within the sound discretion of the family court, the exercise of which will not be overturned absent a showing of abuse.
- stating the family court has the discretion to decide whether or not to grant a party's request for attorney's fees
- reimbursable expenses include the reasonable and necessary expenses incurred in obtaining evidence of spouse’s infidelity
- although the court properly denied alimony under the circumstances existing at the time of decree, husband’s pre-existing disability entitled him to reservation of alimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chandler, Ness, Gregory, Harwell, Finney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-05-24· cited 145×
- Donahue v. DonahueSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-09-25· cited 100×
- Bowers v. BowersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-25· cited 80×
- Shirley v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-31· cited 63×
- Bakala v. BakalaSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-01-27· cited 59×
- Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-12-21· cited 49×
- Lanier v. LanierCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-03-21· cited 38×
- Peterson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-08-22· cited 37×
- Nasser-Moghaddassi v. MoghaddassiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-31· cited 37×
- Miles v. MilesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-08-22· cited 30×
- Arnal v. ArnalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-02-07· cited 29×
- Lacke v. LackeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-10· cited 28×
- Ellerbe v. EllerbeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-07-15· cited 25×
- Reiss v. ReissCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-02-23· cited 25×
- Nicholson v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-06-06· cited 22×
- Haselden v. HaseldenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-08-06· cited 22×
- Hough v. HoughCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-01-17· cited 20×
- Henggeler v. HansonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-12-14· cited 17×
- Craig v. CraigCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-03-22· cited 16×
- Penny v. GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-03-08· cited 16×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lide v. LideSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-10-26· cited 67×
- Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-08-27· cited 54×
- Doe v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-09-10· cited 23×
- Herring v. HerringSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-10-14· cited 16×
- Clardy v. ClardySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-03-02· cited 14×
- Tucker v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-06-22· cited 13×
- Skipper v. SkipperSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-11-17· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.