Skip to main content

Citations

  • 334 S.E.2d 829
  • 286 S.C. 507
  • 1985 S.C. App. LEXIS 451

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a condoned act of adultery cannot be employed as a bar to paying one spouse alimony as a matter of law
  • finding the marital misconduct was condoned by the husband when the couple continued to cohabitate and voluntarily engage in sexual relations for approximately five months
  • noting the trial judge considered the length of the marriage, the parties' ages, incomes, needs and obligations, financial status, and relative contributions to the marriage
  • noting the trial judge considered the length of the marriage, the parties' ages, incomes, needs and obligations, financial status, and relative contributions to the marriage
  • The Court of Appeals has the right to sustain a trial judge’s order on any ground appearing in the record
  • we have the right to affirm an order of the Circuit Court on any ground appearing in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sanders, Gardner, Goolsby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.