Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 9/10/1985
Doe v. Doe
Citations
- 334 S.E.2d 829
- 286 S.C. 507
- 1985 S.C. App. LEXIS 451
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a condoned act of adultery cannot be employed as a bar to paying one spouse alimony as a matter of law
- finding the marital misconduct was condoned by the husband when the couple continued to cohabitate and voluntarily engage in sexual relations for approximately five months
- noting the trial judge considered the length of the marriage, the parties' ages, incomes, needs and obligations, financial status, and relative contributions to the marriage
- noting the trial judge considered the length of the marriage, the parties' ages, incomes, needs and obligations, financial status, and relative contributions to the marriage
- The Court of Appeals has the right to sustain a trial judge’s order on any ground appearing in the record
- we have the right to affirm an order of the Circuit Court on any ground appearing in the record
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sanders, Gardner, Goolsby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stevenson v. StevensonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-05-23· cited 59×
- Panhorst v. PanhorstCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-02-20· cited 26×
- Sauls v. SaulsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-12-04· cited 17×
- Srivastava v. SrivastavaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-12-23· cited 17×
- Burnett v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-08-25· cited 13×
- Thomson v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-04-25· cited 13×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Father & MotherCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-02-29· cited 10×
- Rice v. School Dist. of FairfieldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-12-12· cited 9×
- S.B. v. S.J.B.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-03-20· cited 6×
- Ashy v. WeCare Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-08-04· cited 5×
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-05-26· cited 5×
- West v. WestCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-12-14· cited 4×
- Dabbs v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-08-03· cited 2×
- Maxwell v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-08-24· cited 2×
- Rowland v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-03-14· cited 2×
- Sb v. SjbNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-03-20
- Landry v. LandrySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-05-13
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McLaughlin v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-05-13· cited 33×
- Clardy v. ClardySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-03-02· cited 14×
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1889-01-03· cited 14×
- Owens v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia· 1981-02-11· cited 11×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-03-16· cited 10×
- Cohen v. CohenNew York Supreme Court· 1951-03-19· cited 9×
- Westbury v. BauerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-01-31· cited 8×
- Funderburk v. FunderburkSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-04-02· cited 8×
- Bros. & Sisters of Charity v. RenfroeCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1938-02-03· cited 7×
- Grubbs v. GrubbsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-11-28· cited 6×
- Lanier v. LanierSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1968-04-11· cited 5×
- — v. —Meigs County Court of Common Pleas· 1895-09-15· cited 5×
- Ex Parte RosserSupreme Court of Alabama· 1978-03-03· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.