Stender v. Lucky Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding employee’s “subjective and ambiguous decision- making processes” incapable of separation for analysis
• finding employee’s “subjective and ambiguous decision- making processes” incapable of separation for analysis
• finding employee’s “subjective and ambiguous decision-making processes” incapable of separation for analysis
• this formulation is designed to combat subconscious stereotypes and prejudices which might result in discrimination even absent an intentional practice or explicit policy to that effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).