Skip to main content
· 4/13/1995

Barefoot v. Sundale Nursing Home

Citations

  • 457 S.E.2d 152
  • 193 W. Va. 475
  • 1995 W. Va. LEXIS 82
  • 73 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that after a non-discriminatory justification for action is articulated, “a plaintiff need not show more than the articulated reasons were implausible and, thus, pretexual” in order to defeat a motion for directed verdict
  • holding that plaintiffs evidence showed disparate treatment, but not disparate impact
  • holding that plaintiff's evidence showed disparate treatment, but not disparate impact
  • holding an employment discrimination claim under the WVHRA mirrors an identical claim under Title VII
  • holding an employment discrimination claim under the WVHRA mirrors an identical claim under Title VII
  • holding an employment discrimination claim under the WVHRA mirrors an identical claim under Title VII

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cleckley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.