· 4/13/1995
Barefoot v. Sundale Nursing Home
Citations
- 457 S.E.2d 152
- 193 W. Va. 475
- 1995 W. Va. LEXIS 82
- 73 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 771
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that after a non-discriminatory justification for action is articulated, “a plaintiff need not show more than the articulated reasons were implausible and, thus, pretexual” in order to defeat a motion for directed verdict
- holding that plaintiffs evidence showed disparate treatment, but not disparate impact
- holding that plaintiff's evidence showed disparate treatment, but not disparate impact
- holding an employment discrimination claim under the WVHRA mirrors an identical claim under Title VII
- holding an employment discrimination claim under the WVHRA mirrors an identical claim under Title VII
- holding an employment discrimination claim under the WVHRA mirrors an identical claim under Title VII
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cleckley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.