Supreme Court· 3/24/1952

Bruner v. United States

Citations

343 U.S. 112
72 S. Ct. 581
96 L. Ed. 2d 786
1952 U.S. LEXIS 2284
96 L. Ed. 786

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding repeal of court’s jurisdiction to consider claim for overtime by federal employee “is not affected by the so-called general savings statute”
holding repeal of court’s jurisdiction to consider claim for overtime by federal employee “is not affected by the so-called general savings statute”
dismissing an action and noting that “[t]his rule — that, when a law conferring jurisdiction is repealed without any reservation as to pending cases, all cases fall with the law — has been adhered to consistently by this Court”
\Congress has not altered the nature or validity of petitioner's rights or the Government's liability but has simply reduced the number of tribunals authorized to hear and determine such rights and liabilities\
“Congress has not altered the nature or validity of petitioner’s rights or the Government’s liability but has simply reduced the number of tribunals authorized to hear and determine such rights and liabilities”
“when a law conferring jurisdiction is repealed without any reservation as to pending cases, all cases fall with the law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vinson, Black, Douglas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

143 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Bruner v. United States

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.