Nebraska Court of Appeals· 3/14/1995
State v. Young
Citations
- 530 N.W.2d 269
- 3 Neb. Ct. App. 539
- 1995 Neb. App. LEXIS 90
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that collateral estoppel does not require a criminal court to accept as binding an administrative proceeding’s license revocation determination
- holding that collateral estoppel does not require a criminal court to accept as binding an administrative proceeding's license revocation determination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sievers, Hannon, Mues
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HigaHawaii Supreme Court· 1995-05-17· cited 150×
- Luk v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-11-27· cited 89×
- State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-10-18· cited 75×
- State v. McClendonWashington Supreme Court· 1997-05-01· cited 70×
- State v. ZerkelCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1995-07-28· cited 60×
- State v. YoungNebraska Supreme Court· 1996-03-08· cited 27×
- Schrefler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-01-18· cited 25×
- State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-01-03· cited 19×
- State v. KocherSupreme Court of Iowa· 1996-01-17· cited 17×
- State v. ArbonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1996-01-05· cited 15×
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-12-14· cited 13×
- Roach Enterprises, Inc. v. License Appeal CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois· 1996-01-12· cited 12×
- Kane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1996-04-12· cited 11×
- Elliott v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2011-02-24· cited 10×
- State v. LomasNevada Supreme Court· 1998-04-02· cited 9×
- Ex Parte MataTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1996-06-06· cited 9×
- Bowen v. State, Department of TransportationWyoming Supreme Court· 2011-01-04· cited 6×
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-11-21· cited 5×
- People v. CondarcoCriminal Court of the City of New York· 1995-09-28· cited 4×
- Opinion No. (1995)Nebraska Attorney General Reports· 1995-07-10
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 1,050×
- United States v. $405,089.23 U.S. Currency, Charles Arlt James Wren Payback Mines, Claimants-AppellantsNinth Circuit· 1994-09-06· cited 354×
- State v. HirschNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-01-28· cited 133×
- State v. DeanNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-11-18· cited 113×
- State Ex Rel. Stenberg v. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court· 1995-02-03· cited 88×
- Kopecky v. National Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1994-01-07· cited 63×
- State v. RatliffOregon Supreme Court· 1987-10-20· cited 56×
- Rosse v. RosseNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-01-21· cited 52×
- United States v. McCaslinW.D. Washington· 1994-09-02· cited 40×
- State v. BishopNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-03-18· cited 36×
- L. J. Vontz Construction Co. v. City of AllianceNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-04-29· cited 35×
- State v. GerdesNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-09-29· cited 25×
- State v. StearnsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-09-04· cited 22×
- Schillerstrom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-07-26· cited 21×
- Durfee v. RessNebraska Supreme Court· 1957-02-15· cited 20×
- Ziemba v. JohnsNebraska Supreme Court· 1968-12-20· cited 19×
- Walton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-05-21· cited 17×
- Bartunek v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1994-03-01· cited 17×
- McCook National Bank v. MyersNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-07-23· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.