Skip to main content
· 10/18/1995

State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. Kennedy

Citations

  • 904 P.2d 1044
  • 120 N.M. 619

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the state government regulates 16 activity of driving in the interest of the public’s safety and general welfare
  • indicating that an incidental deterrent purpose does not outweigh the remedial intent of a sanction
  • indicating that an incidental deterrent purpose does not outweigh the remedial intent of a sanction
  • stating that our Supreme Court exercises its power of superintending control in exceptional circumstances, including preventing costly delays
  • applying Blockburger in determining “whether the conduct precipitating the revocation hearing and the criminal prosecution consists of one offense or two offenses”
  • applying Blockburger in determining \whether the conduct precipitating the revocation hearing and the criminal prosecution consists of one offense or two offenses\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Franchini, Baca, Ransom, Frost, Minzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.