Oregon Supreme Court· 10/20/1987

State v. Ratliff

Citations

744 P.2d 247
304 Or. 254
1987 Ore. LEXIS 1854

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

proceeding at least ten miles per hour below speed limit may be indication of driving under the influence
stating in the reasonable suspicion context that “[t]he significance of any of the facts known to the officer may be enhanced by the officer’s special knowledge of the way certain crimes are committed”
declining to apply the doctrine of issue preclusion to a hearing in which “litigation is not conducted as it would be in court with two adversary parties and a neutral judge”
constitutional basis in a criminal case is the principle of double jeopardy, and civil common-law doctrine is based on judicial economy
no basis for application of collateral estoppel where suspension proceedings were expedited and informal in contrast to criminal proceedings
no basis for application of collateral estoppel where suspension proceedings were expedited and informal in contrast to criminal proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.