Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 11/21/1995
State v. Parker
Citations
- 538 N.W.2d 141
- 1995 WL 564754
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- 180-day revocation rationally related to the remedial purpose of ALS statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klaphake, Toussaint, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 1,050×
- State v. StrongSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-01-10· cited 77×
- Heddan v. DirkswagerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-07-01· cited 66×
- Butler v. DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1992-11-30· cited 65×
- Emerson Emory v. Texas State Board of Medical ExaminersFifth Circuit· 1984-12-17· cited 51×
- State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-08-09· cited 34×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-04-02· cited 32×
- State v. YoungNebraska Court of Appeals· 1995-03-14· cited 26×
- State v. SpildeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-09-05· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.