Oregon Supreme Court· 3/9/2000
State v. Langdon
Citations
- 999 P.2d 1127
- 330 Or. 72
- 2000 Ore. LEXIS 151
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that sentencing guidelines approved by the legislature had the authority of statutory law
- concluding that sentencing guidelines approved by the legislature had the authority of statutory law
- repeal of statute by implication not favored and must be established by plain, unavoidable, and irreconcilable repugnancy
- “Although the sentencing guidelines were created as administrative rules, the legislature approved them in 1989, giving them the authority of statutory law.”
- “[T]he [400 percent! rule operates in reference to presumptive sentences that the court has already adjusted under the 200 percent rule.”
- because sentencing guidelines are submitted to the legislature for approval pursuant to ORS 137.667, they have the force of statutes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, and Durham, Justices
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LaneOregon Supreme Court· 2015-08-06· cited 55×
- State v. Ferman-VelascoOregon Supreme Court· 2002-02-28· cited 52×
- United States v. Ronald Lester ParryNinth Circuit· 2007-03-14· cited 28×
- Arken v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court· 2011-10-06· cited 28×
- State v. RusenOregon Supreme Court· 2022-05-12· cited 28×
- State v. WorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-30· cited 23×
- State v. DiltsOregon Supreme Court· 2003-12-18· cited 22×
- State v. NewellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-03· cited 19×
- State v. DiltsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-01-30· cited 19×
- State v. CarltonOregon Supreme Court· 2017-02-09· cited 19×
- Layton v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-29· cited 13×
- State v. NygaardCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-04-29· cited 13×
- State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-09-05· cited 11×
- State v. PembertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-03-04· cited 10×
- State v. MonroCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-08· cited 7×
- State ex rel Rosenblum v. Living Essentials, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-14· cited 7×
- Putnam v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-22· cited 6×
- State v. KragtOregon Supreme Court· 2021-09-30· cited 6×
- State v. LogstonOregon Supreme Court· 2025-07-31· cited 6×
- State v. PartainCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-05-13· cited 5×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.