State v. Halvorson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a double jeopardy challenge where the initial contempt proceedings, which resulted in a significant monetary sanction, were typical of a “civil proceeding for litigation-misconduct”
• affirming attorney fee award when “[t]he court’s analysis reflects that it was guided by [the 20.075 factors] in determining what fees were reasonable and does not reflect any legal or factual error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• N. F. M. v. Khalidi
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-11-17· cited 10×
• State v. Halvorson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-22· cited 2×
• State v. Halvorson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-06-28· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hudson v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1997-12-10· cited 1,410×
• State v. Ramos
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-02-19· cited 74×
• State v. Aguirre-Rodriguez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2021-03-04· cited 37×
• State v. Worth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-30· cited 23×
• State v. Herfurth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-29· cited 23×
• State v. Jordan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-28· cited 22×
• State v. Selness
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-09-19· cited 17×
• DeVaux v. Presby
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-09-06· cited 16×
• State v. Perdew
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-06-03· cited 13×
• State v. Yocum
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-29· cited 7×
• State v. Fox
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-14· cited 5×