Oregon Supreme Court· 3/18/1993

State v. Davis

Citations

847 P.2d 834
315 Or. 484
1993 Ore. LEXIS 28

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that court’s statement that the defendant “had numerous opportunities to renounce criminal intent, but chose to continue the sexual assaults” was adequate to show that the court determined that the commission of one offense was not incidental to the other
noting that ORS 161.737(2) requires the judge to “indicate on the record” the presumptive sentence under the sentencing guidelines and that, under ORS 144.232(1
stating that the “determinate” part of a dangerous offender sentence is “the part that the offender must serve[,]” and that the “indeterminate” part is “the part that the offender may serve, but from which the offender may be released to post-prison supervi- sion.” (Emphases in original.)
the Implementation Manual contains the “official commentary to each of the rules comprising the guidelines”
the Implementation Manual contains the “official commentary to each of the rules comprising the guidelines”
“[The] presumptive sentence serves as the determinate part of the dangerous offender sentence — i.e., the part that must be served.” (Emphasis in original.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.