Skip to main content

State v. Wolf

Citations

  • 605 N.W.2d 381
  • 2000 Minn. LEXIS 35
  • 2000 WL 114315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming exclusion of expert testimony because “[t]he record does not contain such basic information as when [the defendant] last consumed alcoholic beverages, the amount and type of alcohol consumed, or even his accurate height and weight at the time of arrest”
  • “We have held that a party fails to preserve for appeal a ruling excluding evidence when that party fails to make an offer of proof showing the nature of the evidence excluded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilbert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.