Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1/27/2000
State v. Wolf
Citations
- 605 N.W.2d 381
- 2000 Minn. LEXIS 35
- 2000 WL 114315
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming exclusion of expert testimony because “[t]he record does not contain such basic information as when [the defendant] last consumed alcoholic beverages, the amount and type of alcohol consumed, or even his accurate height and weight at the time of arrest”
- “We have held that a party fails to preserve for appeal a ruling excluding evidence when that party fails to make an offer of proof showing the nature of the evidence excluded.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gilbert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-07-01· cited 98×
- State v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-12-13· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. SeniorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-03-13· cited 37×
- State v. FairbanksSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-02-05· cited 31×
- McCollum v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-03-21· cited 26×
- State v. ReeseSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-03-03· cited 25×
- State v. BabichCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-03-07· cited 21×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-08-21· cited 18×
- State v. BreauxCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-01-02· cited 12×
- State v. ThielCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-05-27· cited 12×
- State v. DowneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-02-09· cited 9×
- In Re the Welfare of M.P.Y.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-07-26· cited 8×
- State of Minnesota v. Brian George FitchSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-08-24· cited 8×
- State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-07-31· cited 7×
- Neppel v. NeppelNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-03-08· cited 5×
- State v. LemmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-06-20· cited 4×
- State v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-05-26· cited 4×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-11-13· cited 4×
- State v. BasalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-03-31· cited 3×
- Ken Martin v. Steve Simon, Minnesota Secretary of State, The Legal Marijuana Now Party, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2024-05-10· cited 2×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-30· cited 451×
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-29· cited 192×
- Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-04-22· cited 99×
- State v. RichardsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-12-31· cited 86×
- State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-04· cited 82×
- State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-18· cited 74×
- State v. GreenleafSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-04-15· cited 70×
- State v. GutSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1868-07-15· cited 52×
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. WickaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-08-30· cited 47×
- State v. MilesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-10-08· cited 36×
- State v. KrejciSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-08-03· cited 30×
- Striebel v. Minnesota State High School LeagueSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-07-09· cited 26×
- Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. TurnhamSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-07-02· cited 26×
- State v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-03-10· cited 15×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-02-12· cited 11×
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1885-07-23· cited 9×
- State v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-04-20· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.