In Re the Welfare of M.P.Y.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that offer of proof was not necessary when substance of precluded testimony was apparent
• reversing where there was “no evidence in the record that the trial court considered a continuance or that the state requested one”
• reversing conviction due to prejudice of being unable to prove alibi

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).