State v. Thiel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he trooper was not obligated to believe appellant’s assertion that there was no more marijuana in the vehicle.”
• “The temporary detention of an individual during a traffic stop is a seizure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Iowa v. Pamela Mildred Middlekauff
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2022-05-27
• State of Minnesota v. Raenard Romalle Douglas
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-09-23

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Carroll v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
• City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 7,112×
• Whren v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
• Chambers v. Mississippi
  Supreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
• California v. Trombetta
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
• United States v. Sharpe
  Supreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
• Nordlinger v. Hahn
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 1,649×
• Exxon Corp. v. Eagerton
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 268×
• State v. Amos
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-03-27· cited 188×
• State v. Othoudt
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-03-13· cited 183×
• State v. Russell
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-12-13· cited 143×
• State v. Askerooth
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-06-17· cited 136×
• State v. Munson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-18· cited 127×
• Raich v. Gonzales
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-03-14· cited 120×
• State v. George
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-01-16· cited 107×
• State v. Wiegand
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-13· cited 104×
• In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-03-13· cited 97×
• State v. Koppi
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-06-08· cited 97×
• Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Hyatt
  Supreme Court· 2003-04-23· cited 95×