State v. Wolf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Testimony 15 of possible theories of malfunction for which no evidence exists in the record would not assist the trier of fact in resolving the factual issue of whether [appellant’s] blood-alcohol level was more than .10.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wolf
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-01-27· cited 27×
• State v. Daniels
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-05-26· cited 4×
• State v. Jacobson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-06-15· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Helterbridle
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-10-31· cited 88×
• Matter of Blilie
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-01-22· cited 84×
• State v. Buchanan
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-11-23· cited 79×
• State v. Koskela
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-09-01· cited 41×
• State v. Krejci
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-08-03· cited 30×
• State v. Jensen
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-03-10· cited 15×
• County of Benton v. County of Stearns
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-07-21· cited 1×