Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 1/24/1996

State v. Wilson

Citations

  • 74 Ohio St. 3d 381
  • 659 N.E.2d 292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “Morgan does not require judges to allow individual voir dire on separate mitigating factors” because “jurors cannot be asked to weigh specific factors until they have heard all the evidence and been fully instructed on the applicable law”
  • “Prosecutors can urge the merits of their cause and legitimately argue that defense mitigation evidence is worthy of little or no weight”
  • trial court properly limited the defense’s voir dire on what jurors would consider as mitigation
  • trial court properly limited the defense's voir dire on what jurors would consider as mitigation
  • “This instruction is unconstitutional under Winship because it required Wilson to disprove ‘knowledge,’ which is an element of the offense of kidnapping.”
  • Morgan does not require individual voir dire on separate mitigating factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, Farmer, Fifth, Moyer, Only, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.