Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 1002

Syllabus

In reopened appeal, court concludes that appellant's statutory and constitutional speedy-trial rights were not violated because less than 270 days elapsed between arrest and trial, and the length of the delay was not presumptively prejudicial. Appellant's prior appellate counsel did not provide ineffective assistance by failing to assert this meritless claim on direct appeal.

Judges: Dorrian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.