Ohio Supreme Court· 5/17/1989

State v. Adams

Citations

43 Ohio St. 3d 67
538 N.E.2d 1025
1989 Ohio LEXIS 82

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding subsequent indictment for trafficking, the result of extensive audit of financial records, not bound to 270-day speedy-trial timetable of original arrest
“‘It has been pointed out that “courts indulge every reasonable presumption against waiver” of fundamental constitutional rights and that we “do not presume acquiescence in the loss of fundamental rights.”’”
further explaining that new “defense considerations may arise” after a nolle prosequi and a new indictment; “[t]hus, a knowing and intelligent waiver cannot be made until all the facts are known by the accused,” including the exact nature of the crime charged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

142 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.