Skip to main content

State v. Diallo

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 5812

Syllabus

On reopened appeal, appellant did not establish that he was deprived of his right to a speedy trial as guaranteed under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. As a result, appellant failed to establish that his prior appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to present an assignment of error on direct appeal asserting a claim that his speedy trial rights were violated. Prior judgment confirmed.

Judges: Dorrian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.