Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/13/2023
State v. Long
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1952
Syllabus
In a reopened appeal, appellant failed to establish that the trial court imposed a vindictive sentence in violation of his due process rights and that his prior appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to present an assignment of error asserting that meritless claim.
Judges: Dorrian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 3,571×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 1,581×
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,156×
- Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court· 1973-05-21· cited 874×
- Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 595×
- Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court· 1986-02-26· cited 534×
- State v. O'DellOhio Supreme Court· 1989-08-23· cited 174×
- State v. Rahab (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-04-18· cited 111×
- State v. Leyh (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-02-08· cited 76×
- Beatty v. AlstonOhio Supreme Court· 1975-07-09· cited 34×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-28· cited 14×
- Estate of Aukland v. Broadview NH, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-29· cited 10×
- State v. LongOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-03· cited 7×
- Dillon v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-23· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.