State v. Bias
Citations
- 204 N.E.3d 639
- 2022 Ohio 4643
Syllabus
Defendant's convictions for murder, attempted murder, felonious assault, discharging a firearm into a habitation and WUD, along with the attendant specifications, including gang specifications, were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Trial court did not err in admitting video recordings of victim-witness's statements to police under Evid.R. 804(B)(6) prosecution showed by preponderance of evidence that defendant engaged in wrongdoing that caused victim-witness to be unavailable for trial and that one purpose of the wrongdoing was to make victim-witness unavailable to testify. Trial court did not err in overruling defendant's motion to suppress photo array procedure was not unduly suggestive and victim's identification was reliable. Defendant did not establish that trial court was biased by participating in Crim.R. 16(F) pre-trial in camera certification hearing or conducting handwriting comparison during Evid.R. 804(B)(6) hearing. Trial court's failure to disclose participation in Crim.R. 16(F) certification hearing prior to defendant's reaffirmance of his jury waiver did not invalidate original jury waiver. No plain error in trial court's admission of nonpropensity-based evidence evidence probative to gang specifications. Defendant failed to prove trial counsel was ineffective.
Judges: Klatt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-28· cited 14×
- State v. PerryOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-10· cited 6×
- State v. LathonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-17· cited 5×
- State v. DillionOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-14· cited 4×
- State v. GuevaraOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-02· cited 4×
- State v. FriessOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-22· cited 4×
- State v. BurksOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-04· cited 4×
- Glass v. Franklin Cty. Dept. of Animal Care & ControlOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-28· cited 2×
- State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-10· cited 2×
- State v. BlackerOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-26· cited 2×
- State v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-27· cited 1×
- State v. StearnsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-26
- State v. MappOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-21
- State v. CunninghamOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-01-09
- State v. HoldenOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-25
- State v. BiasOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-29
- State v. FlemingOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-09-05
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-08
Cites
75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 3,512×
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1879-01-18· cited 1,827×
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court· 1986-02-19· cited 1,385×
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court· 2000-01-05· cited 1,280×
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court· 2001-01-03· cited 1,260×
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court· 2002-05-15· cited 820×
- Giles v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2008-06-25· cited 725×
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court· 2006-06-21· cited 704×
- State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court· 2015-06-24· cited 703×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.