Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 1936

Syllabus

The jury's verdict finding appellant guilty of aggravated robbery and robbery was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel by not objecting to the court's calculation of peremptory challenges and by not presenting the testimony of one of appellant's co-workers who he considered an alibi or the testimony of appellant's accomplice. The trial court did not err in determining that appellant's speedy trial rights were not violated. Appellant's assignments of error are overruled. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Dorrian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.