United States v. David A. Larson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was not an abuse of discretion to admit under Rule 414 evidence of events that occurred 16 to 20 years before trial
• holding that Rule 403's balancing test applied to evidence being offered under Rule 414
• concluding that Rule 403 applies to character evidence admissible under Rule 414
• concluding that Rule 403 1 Unless otherwise indicated, case quotations omit all internal quotation marks, alterations, footnotes, and citations. 2 applies to evidence admissible under Rule 414
• holding that Rule 403’s balancing test applied to evidence being offered under Rule 414
• finding that the similarly worded Rule 414 allows evidence of a propensity to commit child molestation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).