Boyd v. United States
Citations
- 142 U.S. 450
- 12 S. Ct. 292
- 35 L. Ed. 1077
- 1892 U.S. LEXIS 1983
Syllabus
<p>The full and unconditional pardon of a person convicted of larceny and sentenced to imprisonment therefor completely restores his competency as a witness,, although it may be stated in the pardon that it was given for that purpose.</p> <p>On the trial of a person -indicted for murder, it appeared in evidence that the killing followed an attempt to rob. . The court admitted, under objections, evidence tending to show that the prisoner had committed other robberies in that neighborhood, on different days, shortly before the time when the killing took place, and exceptions were taken. Held, that the evidence was inadmissible for any purpose.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that admission of prior crimes committed by defendants so prejudiced their trial as to require reversal
- finding that admission of prior crimes committed by defendants so prejudiced their trial as to require reversal
- finding that admission of prior crimes committed by defendants so prejudiced their trial as to require reversal
- reversing conviction on the ground that the jury convicted defendants on the basis of evidence relating to the commission of prior crimes and not on the basis of competent evidence of the specific crimes charged
- although defendants failed to object to jury charge, defendants objected to introduction of certain evidence, and that exception was not waived by failure to object to charge
- “However depraved in character, and however full of crime 11 their past lives may have been, the defendants were entitled to be tried upon competent evidence, and only for the offense charged.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
185 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,632×
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1966-11-21· cited 1,416×
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1964-02-13· cited 860×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-03-15· cited 570×
- Gratton Earl Moore v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1970-09-24· cited 344×
- United States v. CastilloTenth Circuit· 1998-04-06· cited 301×
- People v. VillatoroCalifornia Supreme Court· 2012-07-30· cited 289×
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-04-03· cited 279×
- White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1971-08-25· cited 253×
- State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court· 1988-02-03· cited 250×
- State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court· 1988-01-11· cited 244×
- Lovely v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1948-08-10· cited 213×
- Eddie Odom v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1967-05-02· cited 183×
- United States v. Martha L. WoodsFourth Circuit· 1973-09-12· cited 152×
- People v. BarrickCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-12-10· cited 150×
- Jesse James Gilbert v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1966-10-24· cited 145×
- Brandon Robisheaux v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-01-07· cited 143×
- State v. HectorOhio Supreme Court· 1969-07-30· cited 143×
- United States v. John Gordon McGlamoryFifth Circuit· 1971-04-08· cited 115×
- State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court· 2015-03-18· cited 115×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.