Arizona Supreme Court· 4/17/1985

State v. Williams

Citations

698 P.2d 678
144 Ariz. 433
1985 Ariz. LEXIS 194

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a suggestive identification is admissible when the circumstances surrounding the identification show the identification to be reliable
holding that a defendant is not prejudiced if he has “timely notice” of the prosecutor’s intent before trial
determining that a suggestive identification was reliable even though witness had given no prior description of the perpetrator
reciting the Biggers factors as “[t]he test for determining whether a suggestive identification is otherwise reliable and admissible.”
reciting the Biggers factors as those to “be examined in determining reliability” of a suggestive identification
reciting the Biggers factors as “[t]he test for determining whether a suggestive identification is otherwise reliable and admissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holohan, Feldman, Gordon, Hays, Cameron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.