Arizona Supreme Court· 10/19/1982
State v. Gerlaugh
Citations
- 654 P.2d 800
- 134 Ariz. 164
- 1982 Ariz. LEXIS 287
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding gruesome and inflammatory evidence may be admitted if it is material to some aspect of the case so long as it is not admitted for the sole purpose of inflaming the jury
- considering a codefen-dant's statement in determining corpus delicti although that statement \could not be considered by the jury to determine appellant’s guilt\
- “[I]n Arizona, first-degree murder is only one crime whether it is premeditated murder or a felony murder.”
- victim still alive after defendant ran over him with his automobile several times
- victim still alive after defendant ran over him with his automobile several times
- “[T]he order of proof is within the discretion of the trial court. When the corpus delicti is later established, a variation in the order of proof does not constitute prejudice to the defendant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hays, Holohan, Gordon, Cameron, Feldman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.