Arizona Supreme Court· 6/24/1982

State v. Williams

Citations

650 P.2d 1202
133 Ariz. 220
1982 Ariz. LEXIS 239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that Rule 403 findings should not be disturbed unless the trial court abused its discretion
explaining that weighing and balancing the Rule 403 factors falls within the trial court’s discretion and “will not be disturbed on appeal unless it has been clearly abused”
finding no prejudice where erroneously admitted statements were “merely cumulative to other testimony”
applying inherent tendency test to uphold trial court’s Rule 403 determination
finding erroneous admission of hearsay evidence was harmless when issue is uncontested
woman's recorded opinion that she believed her boyfriend's confession to her that he had murdered his ex-wife ruled admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Cameron, Holohan, Gordon, Hays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.