Skip to main content

State v. Whitman

Citations

  • 182 N.E.3d 506
  • 2021 Ohio 4510

Syllabus

Appellant's plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered despite trial court's failure to inform him of the potential for consecutive sentences, because Crim.R. 11 does not require such notification prior to accepting a plea of guilty or no contest from a defendant who is pleading to multiple offenses that do not carry mandatory consecutive sentences.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.