Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 12/28/1988

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 40 Ohio St. 3d 130
  • 532 N.E.2d 1295
  • 1988 Ohio LEXIS 431

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[w]e have previously determined that this rule [Crim.R. 11(C)(2)] fully encompasses those procedural requirements established by the United States Constitution upon this issue”
  • “the decision of whether the criminal defendant is to serve the sentences for all his crimes consecutively or concurrently is a matter of 35 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO sentencing discretion, the exercise of which is committed to the trial court”
  • defendant must be informed of the sentence for each charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

99 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.