Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/30/2025

State v. Hinckley

Citations

2025 Ohio 4569

Syllabus

Duhart. Affirming judgment of conviction and sentence because: (1) the sentence for driving under suspension (as argued by appellate counsel) was not contrary to law; and (2) because trial counsel's performance was not deficient for failing to file motions to suppress evidence.

Judges: Duhart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Strickland v. Washington
Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
State v. Bradley
Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
State v. Hamblin
Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 773×
State v. Sanders
Ohio Supreme Court· 2002-01-30· cited 156×
State v. Whitman
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-22· cited 22×
State v. Warren
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-22· cited 7×
State v. Childs
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-26· cited 6×
State v. Hefflinger
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-04· cited 4×
State v. Dahms
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-02· cited 2×
State v. Reynolds
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-30· cited 2×
State v. Dawes
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-22· cited 2×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.