State v. Thieman
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4439
Syllabus
Sulek. Trial court did not unlawfully violate its promise to sentence Thieman to a maximum of 60 months in prison, because it: 1) informed Thieman that the reason for not upholding its promise was Thieman's failure to participate in the PSI; and 2) allowed Thieman the opportunity to withdraw his plea. Trial counsel was not ineffective -- specific performance was not a remedy to which Thieman was entitled and, further, there is nothing to suggest that but for trial counsel's agreement to proceed to sentencing the outcome of the proceedings would have been different.
Judges: Sulek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. HamblinOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 773×
- State v. SandersOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-30· cited 156×
- United States v. Eddie Wayne BrummettSixth Circuit· 1986-03-20· cited 76×
- State v. WhitmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-22· cited 22×
- State v. WarrenOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-22· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.