Skip to main content

State v. Wells

Citations

  • 629 N.W.2d 346
  • 2001 WL 578164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining “we are guided by what the district court did or purported to do in ruling on the motion” in determining whether error was preserved and not the motion’s title
  • admitting such photos and discussing other cases in which such photos were admitted
  • “[T]he district court alleviated any potential prejudice by excluding the photographs that displayed severe decomposition and consumption by scavengers.”
  • “[W]e defer to the fact finder’s determinations concerning witness credibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.