Jensen v. Sattler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding proof of fraud is not required for buyer to recover under Iowa Real Estate Disclosure Act
• finding that no “special relationship” and concomitant duty of care where the plaintiff had purchased a home in an “arms-length and adversarial transaction” with defendant
• finding error was preserved even though “the summary judgment record is not a model of clarity”
• finding error was preserved even though “the summary judgment record is not a model of clarity”
• finding error was preserved even though “the summary judgment record is not a model of clarity”
• finding showing of failure to exercise ordinary care, whether or not the seller lived on the property, to be sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).