Supreme Court of Iowa· 6/29/1977
State v. King
Citations
- 256 N.W.2d 1
- 1977 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1093
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting exclusionary rule is a judicially created remedy for Fourth Amendment violations that rests primarily on “its purported tendency to deter police misconduct”
- mere subjective conclusions of applicant insufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rawlings
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court· 1987-11-17· cited 194×
- State v. ClineSupreme Court of Iowa· 2000-09-07· cited 152×
- State v. AldapeSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-06-17· cited 108×
- State v. ReevesNebraska Supreme Court· 1984-01-20· cited 102×
- State v. GroffSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-08-25· cited 83×
- State v. Allan Banks Gibb IIISupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-03-18· cited 63×
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-11-07· cited 53×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa· 1979-08-29· cited 48×
- State v. HahnSupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-11-23· cited 37×
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Iowa· 2001-06-12· cited 34×
- State v. CuevasSupreme Court of Iowa· 1979-07-25· cited 32×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa· 1980-01-23· cited 28×
- Armento v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Iowa· 1980-03-19· cited 27×
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Iowa· 1980-10-15· cited 26×
- State v. FarberSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-01-20· cited 25×
- People v. Superior Court (Hollenbeck)California Court of Appeal· 1978-08-31· cited 17×
- State v. BurkettSupreme Court of Iowa· 1984-11-14· cited 17×
- State v. MercerMontana Supreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 16×
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of Iowa· 1979-04-25· cited 16×
- State v. ArmentoSupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-07-29· cited 13×
Cites
124 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-11-23· cited 5,133×
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 4,303×
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court· 1974-01-08· cited 3,415×
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 2,653×
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 2,373×
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1976-06-21· cited 2,305×
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-12-11· cited 1,927×
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 1,725×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 1,453×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.