Skip to main content

State v. Schultz

Citations

  • 604 N.W.2d 60
  • 1999 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 304
  • 1999 WL 1242589

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating court seeks “ ‘a result that will advance, rather than defeat, the statute’s purpose’ ” (citation omitted)
  • stating “we will not construe a statute in a way which creates an impractical or absurd result”
  • “The polestar of statutory interpretation is to give effect to the legislative intent of a statute.”
  • we do not construe a statute in a manner which creates an absurd result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cady, Harris, Larson, Lavorato, Snell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.