Carolan v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that lower court improperly excluded a nurse anesthetist's standard-of-care testimony offered against a physician who allegedly negligently administered anesthesia
• concluding that lower court improperly excluded a nurse anesthetist’s standard-of-care testimony offered against a physician who allegedly negligently administered anesthesia
• holding evidence can be offered in rebuttal even if it “technically could have been offered as part of plaintiff’s case-in-chief”
• permitting in camera review under Iowa’s peer review statute, Iowa Code § 147.1 [8]
• stating trial court is given discretion regarding admission of expert testimony
• discussing broad peer review privilege in Iowa Code section 147.135(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).