State v. Tangie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that findings on preliminary questions as to applicability of a hearsay exception are implicit in the district court’s ruling to admit the evidence
• noting that a motion in limine is final and preserves error only when “it is beyond question whether or not the challenged evidence will be admitted during trial”
• explaining error claimed in a court's ruling on a motion in limine is waived unless a timely objection is made when the evidence is offered at trial
• finding such evidence is “enough to infer a defendant’s participation in the crime”
• when court rules on admissibility of evidence in a motion in limine, objection need not be renewed at trial
• “We review a district court’s determination that a conspiracy existed [for purposes of Iowa Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(E)] under the substantial-evidence test.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).