Skip to main content

State v. Webb

Citations

  • 344 Or. App. 365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the defendant’s pro se supplemental assignments of error because they were unpreserved and the defendant did not request plain error review
  • the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting subsequent misconduct evidence that was relevant without relying on character or propen- sity inferences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pag n

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.