Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/22/2025
State v. Webb
Citations
- 344 Or. App. 365
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the defendant’s pro se supplemental assignments of error because they were unpreserved and the defendant did not request plain error review
- the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting subsequent misconduct evidence that was relevant without relying on character or propen- sity inferences
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pag n
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.