Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 4/15/2013
State v. Watson
Citations
- 829 N.W.2d 626
- 2013 WL 1500815
- 2013 Minn. App. LEXIS 32
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to accept the state’s concession of “a threshold issue that presented] a .question of law”
- “We need not accept a party’s concession when the party makes a concession of a threshold issue that presents a question of law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kalitowski, Schellhas, Worke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-05-10· cited 177×
- State v. StrommenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-08-08· cited 147×
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-03-16· cited 131×
- State v. CarridineSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-05-09· cited 103×
- Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-04-01· cited 75×
- Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-09-02· cited 74×
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-02-27· cited 62×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-09-03· cited 53×
- State v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-12-28· cited 50×
- In Re the Welfare of J.B.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-05-14· cited 48×
- State v. McDanielSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-01-21· cited 40×
- Hyatt v. Anoka Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-02-10· cited 35×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-01-22· cited 27×
- State v. CrawleySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-08-08· cited 27×
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-01-11· cited 26×
- KRUMMENACHER v. City of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-06-24· cited 20×
- State v. HageSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-06-03· cited 19×
- In re Pera Police & Fire Plan Line of Duty Disability Benefits of BrittainSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-12-07· cited 15×
- In Re Matter of HildebrandtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-08-09· cited 7×
- State v. WernerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-01-09· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.