Skip to main content
· 2/10/2005

Hyatt v. Anoka Police Department

Citations

  • 691 N.W.2d 824
  • 2005 Minn. LEXIS 58
  • 2005 WL 310796

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating an unambiguous statute may be deemed absurd “only in rare cases [when] the plain meaning utterly confounds a clear legislative purpose” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.